Hotel Workers and Industry Change
Improving competitiveness and working conditions
in the hospitality sector
Click here
for a PDF version.
Hotel Workers and Industry Change is a research project
of COWS. Its goal is to understand how industry restructuring has
affected hotel workers — and how hotels can stay competitive
while providing secure, family-supporting jobs.
In the last few decades, the service sector has proliferated dramatically;
today, it accounts for more than four-fifths of all U.S. jobs. This
growth has been especially marked in hospitality, which employs
about 1.9 million workers in more than 40,000 establishments. Between
1970 and 2000, hotel employment nearly tripled.
But job growth hasn’t been accompanied by increasing job
quality — in the form of high earnings, generous benefits,
or opportunities to advance. The majority of hotel employees can
be found in the housekeeping or food and beverage departments, where
the median wage hovers between $7 and $8 (in 2000 dollars) and work
schedules are notoriously undependable. Fewer than 12 percent of
hotel workers are union members. Like so many other service-sector
workers, these workers face a constant struggle just to get by,
much less get ahead.
Although what hotel workers are experiencing is not a new problem,
conditions are getting worse. In recent years, hotel ownership has
become concentrated in fewer and fewer hands; today, a mere four
companies (not including casino hotels) account for fully 20 percent
of the industry’s $86.5 billion in annual sales. The new owners
— typically giant, publicly held corporations — are
exerting intense pressure on hotels (and departments within hotels,
like food service) to become “profit centers.” In response,
managers have searched relentlessly for ways to raise revenue —
occasionally by raising prices, but more often by paring back staff,
increasing workloads, and outsourcing services to cheaper firms.
COWS researchers are assessing the impact of this restructuring
on workers, and investigating how to mitigate its negative effects.
They conducted fieldwork in four U.S. cities — cities that
rank among the nation’s top business, convention, and urban
tourist markets. They chose two cities where the hotel industry
is marked by a high rate of unionization, or high union density,
and two where the industry is noted for low union density. Then,
within each city, researchers studied two hotels — one union,
and one non-union. By gathering information from managers, workers,
and union representatives — nearly 130 individuals in all
— they hoped to find out whether unions helped to protect
workers against painful cost-cutting measures.
What have COWS researchers learned? First, restructuring has had
severe consequences for hotel employees. Pushed to “do more
with less,” workers are faced with stagnating wages, greater
insecurity, and more stress on the job.
Second, while bad jobs are bad for business — leading to
poor recruitment results and high turnover — hotels have done
little or nothing to make entry-level occupations more palatable
to employees. For example, many hotels have scaled back training
programs — in English as a Second Language (ESL), management
preparation, and even safety — that represented at least a
limited investment in workers. Hotel managers also rely on subjective
personnel practices that prevent entry-level workers — especially
immigrants whom they view as unsuited for or uninterested in advancement
— from moving into supervisory positions or learning new skills.
Third, density makes a difference. Nationally, unionized hotel
workers earn more money than their non-union counterparts —
and that’s especially true for those at the bottom of the
pay scale. But COWS researchers have found that the key factor in
union effectiveness is union density — not just the union’s
presence at a given hotel. For example, in high-density cities,
unions are more likely to have some say over workloads, scheduling,
and the use of part-time and temporary staff. At times, unions have
even been able to prevent outsourcing of restaurant facilities —
or at least to exert some control over the process. And on rare
occasions, unions have chipped away at barriers to upward mobility
by convincing hotels to cross-train workers during slack periods.
Finally, strong hotel unions can benefit both employers and workers
— because they can participate in powerful partnerships that
keep hotels competitive while improving hotel workers’ jobs.
One impressive example is the Culinary Training Academy (CTA), established
by a consortium of Las Vegas hotel casinos and unions in 1993. The
CTA provides free job training, ESL classes, and GED preparation
to all comers, and its record is so outstanding that even non-union
employers are eager to hire its graduates. The CTA not only solves
employers’ recruitment and retention problems but also helps
workers — particularly recent immigrants and former welfare
recipients — to gain on-the-job experience and acquire marketable
skills.
The San Francisco Hotels Partnership Project (SFHPP) also provides
job training, along with classes in such areas as grievance resolution
and basic skills. Building on its success in preparing entry-level
employees for higher-paying banquet service positions, the SFHPP
has launched an exciting new initiative to create career ladders
for hotel workers. The project — covering San Francisco, San
Diego, San José, and Los Angeles — emphasizes redesigning
jobs, revamping promotion policies, and offering paid training across
occupational categories so workers can make lateral moves.
As these partnerships show, both employers and workers can benefit
by devising “high road” solutions to common problems.
But so far, the record has proved most promising in high-end facilities,
whose managers recognize that investing in a skilled workforce can
lead to long-term financial success. How might partnerships play
out in smaller firms, or in service-sector industries — such
as food service, retail, and health care — where turnover
rates are even higher than in hotels and profit margins are notoriously
low? We need to keep investigating — and keep experimenting
— to see what works best. Hotel Workers and Industry Change
is pointing the way.
|