Budget and Tax Policy
Toward Fair Taxes and High-Road Budgeting
Click here for a PDF version.
Wisconsin currently faces daunting fiscal problems:
record budget deficits, rising unemployment, and an increasingly
regressive tax structure, to name just a few. COWS, in its attempts
to foster high-road economic development, has increasingly spoken
out on these and other state budget and tax issues, and is helping
to create a dialogue in which long-term solutions can be found to
the state’s fiscal problems.
COWS recently released a national report explaining
exactly “Who Pays?” taxes in Wisconsin. Going beyond
rhetoric and simplistic state-by-state tax comparisons, the report
details the “incidence” of taxation in each state –
in other words, how much of a person’s income is paid in taxes,
broken down by different income groups. The report was produced
by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a national leader
on fiscal issues and frequent collaborator with COWS. The results
of the report, which revealed how Wisconsin’s poor pay more
in taxes as a percent of their income than the wealthiest in the
state, generated significant media attention and public concern.
COWS is urging the state’s Department of Revenue to conduct
a similar “Tax Incidence Study” on a regular basis.
COWS has also called for significant changes to our
current “rainy-day” fund provisions. Deposits to the
state’s savings account have been non-existent, further exacerbating
our fiscal troubles. COWS’ proposals were detailed in several
newspaper articles and have been of interest to key lawmakers.
COWS regularly works with other organizations interested
in fiscal issues at the state and national levels. For instance,
COWS recently teamed up with Wisconsin Citizen Action and the Wisconsin
State AFL-CIO to expose how federal tax cuts will likely bring ballooning
deficits and job loss to our state.
COWS staff frequently field budget and tax questions
from legislative and government agency offices as well as from the
media. On occasion, COWS staff deliver presentations to organizations
interested in “high-road” budget and tax alternatives.
Recently, our Senior Policy Associate served as a technical advisor
to the Economic Summit III’s Fiscal Policy Group, a group
of former state officials who presented an alternative budget plan
at the Summit in Milwaukee in October 2002. The group’s work,
a highlight of the Summit, was described by the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel
this way: “The grown-ups finally have joined the debate over
Wisconsin’s state budget mess.”
You can look to COWS to focus attention on specific
aspects of our tax code – anomalies, really – that add
to the regressivity mentioned above and are hampering efforts to
get Wisconsin’s economy on the high road. A few of these are
the capital gains tax exclusion, separate entity reporting of corporate
income, and a sales tax that no longer reflects the nature of our
state’s economy. Changes to these and other elements of our
tax code could help guarantee tax fairness as well as tax sufficiency
– that is, a revenue stream sufficient to match Wisconsin’s
historic values and priorities.
|